Welcome to Blog Flux Subscribe with Bloglines BritBlog BritBlog BritBlog
BritBlog BritBlog
BritBlog BritBlog BritBlog BritBlog
Blogs lists and reviews
Add link
Comments and Complaints
YOUR COMMENTS AND COMPLAINTS ARE WELCOME!
Just don't waste our time with
porn, pills, gambling & crapola!

TRUTH is TREASON in the Land of Tyranny!

LINK:  http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=282999 Title:  D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility Memo on Quo Warranto applicability and enforcement

Source:  [None]
URL Source:  [None]
Published:  Feb 2, 2010
Author:  By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ


[Valid RSS]Valid RSS feed.

D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility Memo on Quo Warranto applicability and enforcement

LINK:  http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=282999 Title:  D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility Memo on Quo Warranto applicability and enforcement

Source:  [None]
URL Source:  [None]
Published:  Feb 2, 2010
Author:  By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ


Memo on Quo Warranto applicability and enforcement
By Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ
orlytaitzesq.com

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688
Ph.949-683-5411
Fax 949-766-7603
Dr_Taitz@yahoo.com

1.  DC Quo Warranto statute 16-351-16-3503 allows removal from office of any federal officer 60; Writ of Quo Warranto to be issued in the name of the United States of America against a person, who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military 61;
2.  There is no limitation in Quo Warranto, as such it includes the office of the President of the United States and the Commander in Chief.
3.  There is no provision in the statute limiting the enforcement of the statute to one specific branch of law enforcement.  As such it can be any law enforcement:  it can be police, military police, sheriff, marshal, department of Homeland Security Enforcement, FBI.
4.  There is no limitation as to who can enforce the statute.  It can be enforced by any court within DC:  DC Superior court, US district court and military court marshal, since the franchise of the Commander in Chief of the US military relates to the military general court marshal.
5.  In order to occupy the position/franchise of the President of the US, one has to be a Natural Born Citizen, according to Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution
6.  Definition of the Natural Born can be found in the Law of Nations by Emer de Vattel, legal treatise and legal dictionary, quoted in the Constitution and widely used by the framers of the Constitution.
7.  According to the Law of Nations, Natural born Citizen needs to be born in the country to two parents, citizens of the country, not owing allegiance to any other sovereignties.  Law of Nations, Emer de Vattel Vol 1, Chapter 19 212.
8.  Obama never qualified for presidency due to the fact that his father was never a US citizen.  Barack Hussein Obama Sr. was a British Protected person from the colony of Kenya, residing in US on student visa.  Later when Obama57;s mother remarried Indonesian National Lolo Soetoro, Obama gained Indonesian citizenship.  As such Obama since birth and until now had and has citizenship and allegiance to three foreign nations:  Kenya, Great Britain and Indonesia and was never eligible for US presidency.
9.  Additionally, there is no legally acceptable evidence of Obama57;s US birth either.
10.  In spite of some 100 legal actions and 12 citizen Grand Jury indictments Obama refused to release any of his original vital records:  he never released his original typewritten birth Certificate from 1961, which was supposed to show the name of the hospital, name of the attending physician and names of three individuals in attendance, he never released his school enrolment records, no one could locate labor and delivery file from Kapiolani hospital or any other vital records.
11.  Obama released only a photo shopped computer image of the abbreviated Certification of Life birth issued in 2007, which does not provide any name of the hospital, name of the physician or any signatures.
12.  State of HI statute 338-5 allows one to obtain such documents based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborative documents from any hospital.  Additionally HI statute 338-17 allows foreign born children of HI residents to get HI birth certificates.
13.  In 1961 all of birth certificates, including questionable ones, issued based on statutes 338-5 and 338-178 were forwarded by the HI Health Department to the HI news agency and published in two news papers:  morning and evening papers, therefore news paper announcement quoted by Obama supporters are irrelevant for determination of birth.
14.  Additionally, no one could locate the actual news papers with the birth announcements.  The only thing that was ever found:  was a copy, which no one certified as authentic.
15.  Probably the most telling evidence of fraud is the fact that the social security number most commonly used by Obama from 1981 until now 042-68-4425, is a number issued in the state of CT to an individual born in 1890.  According to licensed investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey Obama has used numerous different SS numbers that belonged to deceased individuals and numbers that were never issued.  39 such numbers were used according to National Databases, none of which were issued in HI.
16.  These facts are evidence of massive fraud, treason, social security and IRS fraud and possible other economic crimes, such as elections fraud and fraud of non-profit organizations, and suggests that Obama is not only not eligible for US presidency, but also needs to be criminally prosecuted and punished to the full extent of the law.
17.  As I brought a number of legal actions challenging Obama57;s eligibility, I was subjected to horrific campaign of intimidation, harassment, retaliations, ridicule, slander and attempts to endanger my law license and my life.
18.  A number of convicted criminals and document forgers have sent to courts perjured affidavits, accusing me of suborning perjury, I got numerous death threats, two federal judges were used as puppets, as tools to issue defamatory opinions.  One of them, Judge Clay D. Land in GA has assessed $20,000 in sanctions to intimidate me and stop me from bringing more legal actions, challenging Obama57;s legitimacy.  My car was tampered with, whereby a fumes emissions hose was disconnected, hot combustible fumes went back to my car, endangering me and my 3 children riding with me in the car.
19.  Until and unless there will be enforcement of Quo Warranto and prosecution of Obama for crimes committed against the citizens of the United States of America and the Constitution of this Nation, we can expect intensification of persecutions of dissidents like me and intensification of the grip on power by the illegal Obama regime.

By Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
(Orly has filed case in Washington DC now usurper must answer)
Plaintiff:  ORLY TAITZ
Defendant:  BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #:  1:10-cv-00151-RCL TAITZ v. OBAMA
Assigned to:  Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Case:  1:09-mc-00346-RCL
Cause:  28:1331 Fed. Question
Date Filed:  01/27/2010
Jury Demand:  None
Nature of Suit:  890 Other Statutory Actions
Jurisdiction:  U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff ORLY TAITZ represented by ORLY TAITZ
29839 Santa Margarita Parkway
Suite 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
(949) 683 5411
Fax:  (949) 766 7603
PRO SE V. Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Date Filed # Docket Text
01/27/2010 1 COMPLAINT against BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
(Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 4616027174) filed by ORLY TAITZ.
(Attachments:  # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rdj) (Entered:  01/28/2010)
01/27/2010 SUMMONS (3) Issued as to BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,
U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (rdj) (Entered:  01/28/2010)
1:10-cv-00151-RCL TAITZ v. OBAMA
Royce C. Lamberth, presiding
Date filed:  01/27/2010
Date of last filing:  01/27/2010
Case Summary
Office:  Washington, DC Filed:  01/27/2010
Jury Demand:  None Demand:
Nature of Suit:  890 Cause:  28:1331 Fed. Question
Jurisdiction:  U.S. Government Defendant Disposition:
County:  88888 Terminated:
Origin:  1 Reopened:
Lead Case:  None
Related Case:  1:09-mc-00346-RCL Other Court Case:  None
Def Custody Status:
Flags:  PROSE-NP, TYPE-F
The Akurians.



Contact Us!
YOUR COMMENTS AND COMPLAINTS ARE WELCOME!
Just don't waste our time with
porn, pills, gambling & crapola!

You are Visitor:
california colleges
free-web-page-counters.com
Go Find Colleges

THANKS!
The Akurians.